The recent rains have been a welcome relief from the drought. The only downside is the there have been a sharp influx in the number of mosquitoes. I keep a can of insect repellant to apply by the garden door. I also am experimenting with various mosquito traps. I favor the low tech ones that offer a nice place for mosquitoes to hide and then poison them. If you have a favorite mosquito trap, please send it to me.

This is very selective sparing healthy garden insects. Misters and sprays kill everything.
But it’s not just the annoyance of being bitten, Texas has reported its first case of West Nile Virus in Houston. AND NOW A MOSQUITO CARRYING WNV WAS CAUGHT IS A TRAP IN SAN ANTONIO
West Nile Virus detected months early in San Antonio mosquito trap

The San Antonio Metropolitan Health District detected West Nile virus in a mosquito trap in early May, months earlier than usual. The city and county are urging residents to take precautions against mosquitoes as rainfall, high temperatures and humidity create the perfect conditions for the insects.
The positive mosquito pool was located near the intersection of Hillcrest Drive and Bandera Road in Northwest San Antonio. Metro Health workers fogged and treated standing water in the area shortly afterwards, according to the department’s website.
There have not been any human cases of West Nile virus in Bexar County this year, according to the latest data from the Texas Department of State Health Services.
Although no more mosquito samples have come back positive since May, city and county officials are ramping up efforts to inform the public about how to keep themselves safe from mosquito-borne diseases this summer.
“We have the warmer temperatures, we have the humidity, we have the recent rainfall,” said Joel Lara, senior environmental health officer at Metro Health. “Those are ideal conditions for mosquito development.”
Mosquitoes and West Nile virus
The majority of pesky mosquitoes that bother you in the warmer months are “nuisance mosquitoes.” Although they leave painful bites, they don’t pose much of a risk to humans, explained Molly Keck, an entomologist with Texas A&M AgriLife Extension.
“They’re not known to be good carriers or vectors of various diseases,” Keck said. “They’re just annoying, but they’re not ones that your city health officials would be highly concerned about.”
Only a handful of the over 80 species of mosquitoes in Texas, though, are known to be carriers of illnesses like West Nile virus, the most common mosquito-borne illness in the U.S. These mosquitoes typically get the disease by feeding on infected birds and then transmit the virus to humans and other animals through bites.
Most people infected with West Nile virus don’t experience any symptoms or complications, but roughly 1 in 5 people experience flu-like symptoms, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. There are no specific treatments for West Nile Virus.
In very rare cases (less than 1% of infections), the virus affects the central nervous system, causing inflammation of the brain or spinal cord. Around 10% of people who develop neurological complications die. In Texas, there have been 881 cases of West Nile neuroinvasive disease reported to the state health department from 2020 through 2025, though some of the data is provisional.
Local surveillance and control efforts
Metro Health works to control and monitor the mosquito population in the city through traps, disease detection and treatment of water with insecticides. The efforts start in the spring and last into the fall. Mosquito traps placed in 20 locations around the city are checked and tested on a weekly basis for the presence of West Nile virus.
If a mosquito pool tests positive for the virus, the city deploys insecticide from a truck on an established route, what’s referred to as “fogging,” and may also treat specific pools of standing water. Bexar County’s Department of Public Works runs a similar vector control program for unincorporated areas.

Positive hits for West Nile virus typically don’t show up until mid to late summer in San Antonio, according to city data from recent years.
This year may have been an outlier due to the higher amounts of rainfall the area has experienced this spring, but there’s several factors behind how populations drift, including the migration of birds, which some researchers have theorized was a significant contributor to the 2012 Texas West Nile virus outbreak.
Protecting yourself from mosquitoes this summer
The single most important thing you can do to keep mosquitoes away is eliminating stagnant water around your home, especially dirty water, where mosquitoes reproduce. It doesn’t take much water — even an overturned bottle cap filled with water can breed mosquitoes, Keck said.
Lara advised checking rain gutters, animal food bowls, bird baths and anything else around your residence that could be a breeding ground for the insects. For water that can’t be eliminated, like a heavy bird bath, you could treat the water with insecticide, which is available at home improvement stores.
Keck advised not relying on broad insecticides in the long term since these can also kill natural predators of mosquitoes like dragonflies. Instead, look for Bti products, which target mosquito larvae without harming most other insects, Keck said.
If you have to be outside, especially during peak mosquito activity hours at dawn and dusk, wear long sleeves and pants, or spray yourself with insect repellent.
“Water is the big thing,” Keck said. “Stay indoors during dawn and dusk — that tends to be when the species of mosquito that more likely is to carry West Nile is more active. Wear insect repellent. Cover yourself up, which is really hard in the summer in Texas, or just use any form of an insect repellent when you know you’re going to be outside when you might be encountering mosquitoes.”
Are you doing your part?
Texas reports first 2026 West Nile virus case in Houston. What to know
Texas health authorities have reported the first case of West Nile virus in the state in 2026 near Houston.
The Texas Department of State Health Services reported that a Harris County resident had become ill from the mosquito-borne illness on Tuesday, May 19.
“West Nile and other mosquito-borne illnesses are a fact of life in Texas in the warmer months, and all Texans should take precautions against mosquito bites to stay safe and healthy,” said DSHS Commissioner Dr. Jennifer Shuford in a statement.
DSHS noted that in the past five years, Texas has seen 976 total West Nile cases — West Nile fever and West Nile neuroinvasive. During that span, there were 106 deaths in the state attributed to West Nile.
2024 had the most recorded deaths at 57, while 2025 fatalities were the fewest at 9.
Here’s what you need to know about West Nile virus and how to stay safe.
West Nile virus symptoms
Most people won’t know they have the virus.
According to DSHS, roughly 80% of people infected with West Nile never experience symptoms.
The other 20% will develop West Nile fever and experience:
- Fever.
- Headache.
- Nausea.
- Muscle and joint aches.
- Fatigue.
Less than 1% will contract West Nile neuroinvasive disease, a more serious neurological illness that causes tremors, convulsions, neck stiffness, disorientation, paralysis and even death.
How is West Nile virus spread?
Humans can get infected from a bite from an infected mosquito.
DSHS reports there is no evidence that West Nile virus spreads from animal to person or from person to person, except in rare cases through blood product transfusion, tissue transplantation or mother-to-baby transmission.
West Nile virus treatment
There is no specific treatment for West Nile virus infections, says DSHS.Is there a vaccine against West Nile Virus?
According to DSHS, not for humans.
How to prevent West Nile virus?
The Centers for Disease Control offer the following tips to prevent getting infected and the spread of West Nile virus:
- Drain standing water — Remove water from flowerpots, buckets, pet bowls, birdbaths, and gutters to stop mosquitoes from breeding. Also do the same for standing water inside your home.
- Insect repellent — Use an insect repellent registered with the Environmental Protection Agency.
- Dusk and Dawn — Limit outdoor activities during these peak mosquito hours.
- Dress in long sleeves and pants — Wear loose-fitting long sleeves and pants and spray repellent on your clothes for extra protection.
According to the CDC, if the number of mosquitoes in an area becomes too high or they are found to be infected with West Nile virus, mosquito control professionals may use products to kill mosquito larvae (larvicides) or adult mosquitoes (adulticides).
These tips will also protect against other mosquito-borne viruses, like dengue, chikungunya, and Zika, for which DSHS has noted a global rise in cases.
For more information, visit the DSHS mosquito-borne diseases site.
Mateo Rosiles is the Texas Connect reporter for USA TODAY and its regional papers in Texas. Got a news tip for him? Email him at mrosiles@usatodayco.com.
Key Points: Insect Repellents
- DEET is highly effective against mosquitoes and ticks and is generally safe.
- PPicaridin appears to be as effective against mosquitoes as similar concentrations of DEET and may be better tolerated on the skin. It also repels ticks.
- IR3535 at concentrations ≥10% can be effective in repelling mosquitoes and ticks.
- PMD (para-menthane-3,8-diol), the active ingredient in oil of lemon eucalyptus (OLE), has been as effective as DEET against mosquitoes in some studies. It is generally not recommended for use on children <3 years old.
- Citronella oil-based insect repellents provide short-term protection against mosquitoes, but not ticks. Other essential oils also provide limited protection against mosquitoes
- Wearing clothing treated with the insecticide permethrin in addition to using DEET or picaridin on exposed skin provides the most complete protection against mosquitoes and ticks.
- Wearable devices such as wristbands and patches are not effective.
Outline
Table
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommend using insect repellents to avoid being bitten by mosquitoes, ticks, and other arthropods that transmit disease-causing pathogens. Repellents applied to exposed skin should be used in conjunction with other preventive measures such as wearing long-sleeved shirts, pants, and socks and avoiding outdoor activities during peak mosquito-biting times.1 Some insect repellents are listed in Table 1.
Mosquitoes can transmit pathogens such as Zika, chikungunya, dengue, West Nile, eastern equine encephalitis, and yellow fever viruses, and the malaria parasite. Biting midges (no-see-ums) and some mosquitoes can transmit Oropouche virus. Ticks can transmit the bacteria that cause Lyme disease and Rocky Mountain spotted fever, the parasite that causes babesiosis, and viruses such as Powassan virus.
DEET — The insect repellent N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) is highly effective against mosquitoes and ticks.2 It also repels chiggers, fleas, and some flies, including biting midges and gnats, but not tsetse flies, which transmit the parasite that causes African trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness). DEET is available in concentrations of 5-100%; higher concentrations typically provide longer-lasting protection, but increasing the concentration above 50% has not been shown to improve efficacy. Products containing ≤20% DEET provide 1-6 hours of protection. A long-acting polymer-based formulation containing 34% DEET has been shown to repel mosquitoes for up to 12 hours.
Topically applied DEET is generally safe.2 Toxic and allergic reactions have been uncommon, and serious adverse effects are rare.3 Rashes ranging from mild irritation to urticaria and bullous eruptions have been reported. A cohort study in US adults found no significant correlation between urinary levels of a DEET metabolite and biomarkers of systemic inflammation or immune, liver, or kidney function.4
Some DEET formulations feel uncomfortably oily or sticky on the skin. DEET can damage clothing made from synthetic fibers and plastics on eyeglass frames and watches.
Children – According to the CDC, DEET can be used on children without age restriction. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends using DEET sparingly on children ≤2 years old. Neurologic adverse events have occurred rarely in infants and children, usually with prolonged or excessive use that sometimes included ingestion of the product. Contact urticaria has been reported.5
PICARIDIN — Picaridin provides protection against mosquitoes, ticks, flies (including biting midges, but not tsetse flies), fleas, and chiggers. It is available in concentrations of 5-20%; higher concentrations typically provide longer-lasting protection. Picaridin appears to be at least as effective against mosquitoes as similar concentrations of DEET.6,7
Picaridin can cause skin and eye irritation, but it appears to be better tolerated on the skin than DEET. Picaridin is odorless and non-greasy; it does not damage fabric or plastic, but it can discolor leather and vinyl. In a review of data from US poison control centers, ingestion of picaridin-based insect repellents resulted in only minor toxicity (mainly ocular or oral irritation and vomiting) that did not require referral to a healthcare facility.8
Children – According to the CDC, picaridin can be used on children without age restriction.
IR3535 — IR3535 (3-[N-butyl-N-acetyl]-amino-propionic acid, ethyl ester), a synthetic version of beta-alanine, is available in the US in concentrations of 7.5% and 20%. It repels ticks, chiggers, and a variety of insects, including mosquitoes, sand flies, and biting midges. The 7.5% concentration provides limited protection (≤2 hours).9 The duration of protection is longer with higher concentrations (≥10%); products containing 20% concentrations have been shown to be effective for up to 8 hours. IR3535 can cause eye irritation, and it can damage some clothing and plastics.
Children – According to the CDC, IR3535 can be used on children without age restriction.
OIL OF LEMON EUCALYPTUS/PMD — Oil of lemon eucalyptus (OLE), which repels mosquitoes, ticks, flies, gnats, and biting midges, occurs naturally in the lemon eucalyptus tree. Extracted OLE is refined to increase the concentration of PMD (para-menthane-3,8-diol), its active ingredient. OLE is available in concentrations of 10-40%. It provides up to 6 hours of protection against mosquitoes.2 Synthetic PMD is also the active ingredient in some commercially available insect repellent products. Some PMD formulations have been as effective as DEET against mosquitoes in laboratory and field studies.10,11 OLE and PMD can cause eye and skin irritation, including allergic skin reactions. Oil of lemon eucalyptus essential oil is not recommended for use as an insect repellent.
Children – OLE and PMD insect repellent products are generally not recommended for use on children <3 years old because allergic skin reactions could occur, but according to the CDC, some products containing OLE as the only active ingredient can be used at concentrations up to 30%.12
2-UNDECANONE — 2-undecanone (methyl nonyl ketone) was originally derived from wild tomato plants. Data on its efficacy are limited. A 7.75% spray formulation that can be applied to skin, clothing, and outdoor gear (BioUD) repels mosquitoes for up to 5 hours and ticks for up to 2 hours according to its label. In field trials, BioUD has been comparable in efficacy to 25-30% concentrations of DEET and more effective than 0.5% permethrin.13,14 It can have a strong odor.
NOOTKATONE — A new active ingredient called nootkatone (NootkaShield) has been developed by the CDC in partnership with a private company.15 It repels and kills ticks and mosquitoes,16,17 and is registered as a biopesticide by the EPA for use in insecticides and insect repellents. Nootkatone is a natural compound found in grapefruit and Alaska yellow cedar trees that has been used for many years to make perfumes and colognes and as a flavoring in foods. In one laboratory study, 20% nootkatone was as effective at repelling mosquitoes as 7% DEET and 5% picaridin.18 Nootkatone-based repellent products are not currently available in the US.
CITRONELLA OIL — Citronella oil-based insect repellents, which are available for topical use in concentrations of 5-10%, provide short-term protection against mosquitoes, but they are not effective against ticks. The duration of protection with most citronella oil products is ≤2 hours; combining citronella oil with vanillin prolongs its protection time. In laboratory studies, mean protection time against mosquito bites was much shorter with citronella oil than with DEET. Eye and skin irritation can occur.5,19
OTHER ESSENTIAL OILS — Essential oils obtained from raw botanical material, including clove, geraniol, rosemary, and peppermint, provide limited and variable protection against mosquitoes. Five commercially available repellent sprays containing combinations of essential oils were tested in a controlled laboratory environment; mosquito attraction to humans was reduced for 30 minutes with four products and for 60 minutes with one.20 Another laboratory study evaluated the repellent efficacy of 20 essential oils against mosquitoes and ticks; 10% formulations of cinnamon oil and clove oil had the longest protection times (~120 minutes).19 High concentrations of essential oils can cause allergic contact dermatitis.21
FACTORS AFFECTING PROTECTION TIME — The actual duration of protection provided by a repellent depends on multiple factors, including the concentrations of active ingredients in the formulation, the amount of repellent applied, the activity level of the user, and environmental conditions. Studies have shown that consumers generally apply doses of insect repellent that are much lower than those applied in laboratory tests of the duration of repellent efficacy.10 A product’s effectiveness may also be reduced by evaporation from the skin surface and wash-off by sweat.6
USE WITH SUNSCREENS — Topical insect repellents can be used with sunscreens; the repellent should be applied after the sunscreen. Applying DEET after sunscreen can reduce the sun protection factor (SPF) of the sunscreen, but applying sunscreen after DEET may increase absorption of DEET.22 Use of products that contain both a sunscreen and an insect repellent should be avoided because the sunscreen may need to be reapplied more often and in greater amounts than the repellent.
PERMETHRIN — A 0.5% formulation of the synthetic pyrethroid contact insecticide permethrin can be sprayed on clothing and gear (e.g., mosquito nets, tents, and sleeping bags) to repel and kill mosquitoes and ticks. It should not be applied directly to skin. Permethrin-impregnated clothing that remains active through multiple launderings is commercially available. Studies in outdoor workers wearing factory-treated, long-lasting permethrin-impregnated clothing have found that the clothing protected against mosquito and tick bites for at least 1 year.23,24 Wearing permethrin-treated clothing and using DEET or picaridin on exposed skin provides the most complete protection.25
Wearing permethrin-treated clothing results in dermal absorption, but the amount absorbed remains below EPA-recommended levels with up to 3 months of use26; no significant adverse effects have been reported.24 An analysis of urine samples from a cohort of US adults found that persons with higher urinary levels of a pyrethroid metabolite (due to environmental exposure from ingestion, inhalation, and/or dermal absorption) had an increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared to those with lower urinary levels of the metabolite (HR 1.56 and 3.00, respectively).27
WEARABLE DEVICES — Several insect repellents, including DEET, OLE, and citronella, are commercially available in wearable devices such as wristbands and patches. These devices have been shown to provide little or no protection against mosquito bites.25,28
PREGNANCY — The CDC considers EPA-registered formulations of DEET, picaridin, IR3535, OLE, PMD, and 2-undecanone safe for use during pregnancy. According to the EPA, there is no evidence that exposure to permethrin results in adverse effects in pregnant or nursing women or developmental adverse effects in their children.29
- EPA. Repellents: protection against mosquitoes, ticks and other arthropods. Available at: https://bit.ly/3HIvk52. Accessed June 18, 2025.
- QD Nguyen et al. Insect repellents: an updated review for the clinician. J Am Acad Dermatol 2023; 88:123. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2018.10.053
- N Giangrande et al. Anaphylactic shock to a DEET-containing insect repellent. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2021; 31:336. doi:10.18176/jiaci.0644
- ZM Haleem et al. Exposure to N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide insect repellent and human health markers: population based estimates from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2020; 103:812. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.20-0226
- H Ghali and SE Albers. An updated review on the safety of N, N-diethyl-meta-toluamide insect repellent use in children and the efficacy of natural alternatives. Pediatr Dermatol 2024; 41:403. doi:10.1111/pde.15531
- L Goodyer and S Schofield. Mosquito repellents for the traveller: does picaridin provide longer protection than DEET? J Travel Med 2018; 25(suppl_1):S10. doi:10.1093/jtm/tay005
- MRG Fernandes et al. Efficacy and safety of repellents marketed in Brazil against bites from Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus: a systematic review. Travel Med Infect Dis 2021; 44:102179. doi:10.1016/j.tmaid.2021.102179
- NP Charlton et al. The toxicity of picaridin containing insect repellent reported to the National Poison Data System. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2016; 54:655. doi:10.1080/15563650.2016.1186806
- SP Frances et al. Comparative field evaluation of repellent formulations containing DEET and IR3535 against mosquitoes in Queensland, Australia. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 2009; 25:511. doi:10.2987/moco-09-5938.1
- L Goodyer et al. Characterisation of actions of p-menthane-3,8-diol repellent formulations against Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2020; 114:687. doi:10.1093/trstmh/traa045
- B Colucci and P Müller. Evaluation of standard field and laboratory methods to compare protection times of the topical repellents PMD and DEET. Sci Rep 2018; 8:12578. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-30998-2
- CR Connelly and JE Gimnig. Mosquitoes, ticks, and other arthropods. April 23, 2025. CDC Yellow Book: Health Information for International Travel, 2026. Available at: https://bit.ly/4n2rVOn. Accessed June 18, 2025.
- BE Witting-Bissinger et al. Novel arthropod repellent, BioUD, is an efficacious alternative to DEET. J Med Entomol 2008; 45:891. doi:10.1093/jmedent/45.5.891
- BW Bissinger et al. Novel field assays and the comparative repellency of BioUD, DEET and permethrin against Amblyomma americanum. Med Vet Entomol 2011; 25:217. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2915.2010.00923.x
- CDC. Vector-Borne Diseases. Press kit: nootkatone. April 24, 2024. Available at: https://bit.ly/3SRhgsj. Accessed June 18, 2025.
- EL Siegel et al. Ixodes scapularis is the most susceptible of the three canonical human-biting tick species of North America to repellent and acaricidal effects of the natural sesquiterpene, (+)-nootkatone. Insects 2023; 15:8. doi:10.3390/insects15010008
- M Fernandez Triana et al. Grapefruit-derived nootkatone potentiates GABAergic signaling and acts as a dual-action mosquito repellent and insecticide. Curr Biol 2025; 35:177. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2024.10.067
- TC Clarkson et al. Nootkatone is an effective repellent against Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Insects 2021; 12:386. doi:10.3390/insects12050386
- HA Luker et al. Repellent efficacy of 20 essential oils on Aedes aegypti mosquitoes and Ixodes scapularis ticks in contact-repellency assays. Sci Rep 2023; 13:1705. doi:10.1038/s41598- 023-28820-9
- S Mitra et al. Efficacy of active ingredients from the EPA 25(B) list in reducing attraction of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) to humans. J Med Entomol 2020; 57:477. doi:10.1093/jme/tjz178
- K Daftary and W Liszewski. Allergenicity of popular insect repellents. Dermatitis 2023; 34:70. doi:10.1089/derm.0000000000000897
- L-M Yiin et al. Assessment of dermal absorption of DEET-containing insect repellent and oxybenzone-containing sunscreen using human urinary metabolites. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2015; 22:7062. doi:10.1007/s11356-014-3915-3
- B Londono-Renteria et al. Long-lasting permethrin-impregnated clothing protects against mosquito bites in outdoor workers. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2015; 93:869. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.15-0130
- C Mitchell et al. Protective effectiveness of long-lasting permethrin impregnated clothing against tick bites in an endemic Lyme disease setting: a randomized control trial among outdoor workers. J Med Entomol 2020; 57:1532. doi:10.1093/jme/tjaa061
- RV Patel et al. EPA-registered repellents for mosquitoes transmitting emerging viral disease. Pharmacotherapy 2016; 36:1272. doi:10.1002/phar.1854
- KM Sullivan et al. Bioabsorption and effectiveness of long-lasting permethrin-treated uniforms over three months among North Carolina outdoor workers. Parasit Vectors 2019; 12:52. doi:10.1186/s13071-019-3314-1
- W Bao et al. Association between exposure to pyrethroid insecticides and risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality in the general US adult population. JAMA Intern Med 2020; 180:367. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6019
- SD Rodriguez et al. Efficacy of some wearable devices compared with spray-on insect repellents for the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae). J Insect Sci 2017; 17:24. doi:10.1093/jisesa/iew117
- US Environmental Protection Agency. Repellent-treated clothing. March 6, 2025. Available at: https://bit.ly/3gERGD4. Accessed June 18, 2025.
FDA Approves New Sunscreen Ingredient
The AP (6/9, Perrone) reports, “Federal health regulators on Tuesday signed off on” bemotrizinol, “the first new sunscreen ingredient for the U.S. market in more than 25 years, giving Americans access to a skin-protecting chemical long used in Europe and other parts of the world.” The FDA “says…bemotrizinol met the agency’s standards for protecting from dangerous ultraviolet rays while causing little irritation or absorption into the skin.”
Reuters (6/9, Das) reports that the FDA “said the ingredient is considered safe and effective for use by adults and children aged six months and older.”
The Hill (6/9, Rego) reports, “Bemotrizinol provides protection against ultraviolet A and B rays and has low levels of absorption through the skin into the body, according to an FDA release.”

Key Points: Sunscreens
- Sunscreens that protect against UV radiation reduce the risk of sunburn and photoaging, and regular use has been associated with a reduced risk of some skin cancers.
- Tinted sunscreens add protection against visible light, which can cause hyperpigmentation.
- Use of a broad-spectrum sunscreen with an SPF ≥30 is recommended by the American Academy of Dermatology.
- Sunscreen should be applied 15 minutes before sun exposure and reapplied at least every 2 hours and after swimming or sweating. Most adults require about 1-2 ounces to fully cover all sun-exposed areas.
- Organic sunscreens are absorbed systemically; whether long-term use could result in adverse health effects is unclear.
- Use of the inorganic sunscreens zinc oxide and titanium dioxide is unlikely to result in systemic absorption or toxicity.
- The organic sunscreens oxybenzone and octinoxate have been removed from many sunscreen products because they may be harmful to the environment.
Excessive exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation can cause erythema, photoaging, and skin cancer.1,2 Sunscreens are widely used to reduce these risks, but questions remain about their effectiveness and safety. In 2021, the FDA proposed a rule that would require additional safety studies for some sunscreen active ingredients and mandate better UVA protection in sunscreen products.3
UVA and UVB — UV radiation is classified based on wavelength as UVB (290-320 nm), UVA2 (320-340 nm), and UVA1 (340-400 nm). UVA, which makes up 95% of terrestrial UV radiation, penetrates the dermis and causes long-term damage. UVB, which is mostly absorbed in the epidermis, is largely responsible for the erythema of sunburn. Both UVA and UVB radiation can cause photoaging, hyperpigmentation, and skin cancer.4 UVB is strongest at midday; in temperate climates, it is present primarily in late spring, summer, and early autumn. UVA is relatively constant in sunlight throughout the year and, unlike UVB, is not filtered by clear glass.5
SPF/BROAD SPECTRUM RATINGS — The sun protection factor (SPF) is the ratio of the amount of UV radiation required to produce a minimally detectable sunburn on sunscreen-protected skin to the amount required on unprotected skin. The amount of erythema-producing UV radiation (primarily UVB) that penetrates through a sunscreen product to reach the skin is affected by factors such as exposure time, intensity of solar energy, and the amount applied. When properly applied, a sunscreen product with an SPF of 15, 30, or 50 allows 1/15, 1/30, or 1/50, respectively, of erythemogenic UV photons to reach the skin.
There is no specific rating system in the US for how much UVA protection is provided by sunscreens. The FDA has allowed sunscreens to be labeled “broad spectrum” if they protect against UVA and UVB and the UVA protection is proportional to the UVB protection; it has now proposed requiring that sunscreen products with an SPF ≥15 offer greater UVA protection (UVA1/UV ratio ≥0.7) in order to be labeled broad spectrum.3
Manufacturers of broad-spectrum sunscreens with an SPF ≥15 can claim that their products reduce the risk of skin cancer and photoaging if used as directed with other sun protection measures. The FDA and the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) both recommend use of a broad-spectrum sunscreen with an SPF ≥15.6 The American Academy of Dermatology recommends use of a broad-spectrum, water-resistant sunscreen with an SPF ≥30.7 The FDA has proposed a maximum labeled SPF value of 60+ because data showing that sunscreen products with SPF values >60 provide additional clinical benefits are lacking.3
Concerns have been raised that the current rating system for commercial sunscreens is misleading with regard to the actual protection provided against the adverse effects of sun exposure. In addition, some inorganic sunscreen products include non-FDA-approved organic filters (e.g., butyloctyl salicylate), listed as inactive ingredients, to boost the SPF.8
In the amounts customarily applied to skin, no sunscreen product provides the labeled degree of protection. The FDA requires that SPF values be determined after applying 2 mg/cm2 of the product. At 2 mg/cm2, a 4-ounce container provides 2-4 whole body applications for an adult. Studies have shown that consumers usually apply 0.5-1.0 mg/cm2 or less. Applying 0.5-mg/cm2 doses of sunscreens labeled SPF 30-100 has been shown to provide an actual SPF that is about 25% of the labeled SPF.9
ACTIVE INGREDIENTS — Organic – Several organic sunscreens that absorb different wavelengths of UV radiation are approved by the FDA (see Table 1). Avobenzone is an effective UVA1 absorber, and it also absorbs some UVA2, but it is photolabile; its efficacy decreases by about 60% after 60 minutes of exposure to sunlight. Oxybenzone absorbs both UVB and UVA2. Octinoxate is a potent UVB absorber, but it is photolabile. Octisalate and homosalate are weak UVB absorbers; they are generally used with other agents as photostabilizers. Octocrylene absorbs UVB and UVA2 and is photostable; when combined with other sunscreens, it can improve the photostability of the entire product. Ecamsule is photostable and absorbs both UVA2 and UVA1.10,11
PABA (para-aminobenzoic acid) and trolamine salicylate are not considered GRASE (generally recognized as safe and effective) by the FDA and are no longer available in sunscreen products sold in the US.3
Bemotrizinol (PARSOL Shield; also sold as Tinosorb S, Escalol S), a photostable UVA and UVB filter that has been available in Europe and Australia for many years, is under review by the FDA and may be available in 2026. In a preliminary trial in healthy adults, maximal application of a sunscreen formulation containing 6% bemotrizinol did not result in meaningful systemic exposure (only 13 of 299 plasma samples showed quantifiable bemotrizinol).12
Inorganic – The two FDA-approved inorganic sunscreens, zinc oxide and titanium dioxide, block UVB, UVA2, and UVA1 penetration, and they are photostable. Zinc oxide offers better UVA protection than titanium dioxide. Used together, they provide broad UV protection.13 Nanoparticle formulations are now widely used because they are less visible on the skin, but they may also be less effective.14
OTHER INGREDIENTS — In addition to UV filters, tinted sunscreens, which are often available in a variety of shades to match different skin colors, contain iron oxide pigments (and less commonly non-nanosized pigmentary titanium dioxide) that physically block visible light (400-700 nm). Visible light can induce erythema in light-skinned people and pigmentary changes in dark-skinned people and may play a role in photoaging and some photodermatoses.10,15
Antioxidants such as vitamins E and C and niacinamide are added to sunscreen products to reduce oxidative stress caused by UV radiation and increase photoprotective effects,16,17 but they are not very stable and it is unclear whether they retain their activity when they penetrate the skin. Some plant-derived extracts with antioxidant effects have also demonstrated photoprotective activity in vitro and in animals. Green tea extract, carotenoids such as beta-carotene, lycopene and lutein, and Polypodium leucotomos extract (PLE; derived from a South American species of fern) have been shown to reduce sunburn intensity and improve signs of photodamage in humans, but data are limited.18
FORMULATIONS — Sunscreen dosage forms that the FDA has proposed to classify as GRASE include oils, lotions, creams, gels, butters, pastes, ointments, and sticks. Wipes, towelettes, body washes, and shampoos are excluded for lack of data. Sprays and powders require additional testing. Sunscreen sprays are flammable, and burns requiring hospitalization have been reported. Based on animal models, the small particles in sprays and powders could pose inhalation risks.
PREVENTION OF SKIN CANCER — Long-term daily sunscreen use (combined with other sun-protective measures) has been shown to reduce the risk of some nonmelanoma skin cancers.19 Using a sunscreen with a high SPF may prevent DNA damage to the skin even when the amount applied is less than optimal.20
Melanoma – Fair skin, use of tanning beds, and a history of sunburn are associated with increased melanoma risk.6 In an Australian population-based, case-control study that included 603 adults 18-39 years old with a first primary cutaneous melanoma diagnosis and 1088 controls 18-44 years old, regular sunscreen use in childhood and early adulthood was associated with a reduced risk of cutaneous melanoma.21 In a prospective trial, 1621 Australians 25-75 years old were randomized to use an SPF 16 sunscreen either daily or in a discretionary manner (generally 0-2 times weekly) for 4 years. Daily sunscreen users had 50% fewer new primary melanomas (11 vs 22) and 73% fewer invasive melanomas (3 vs 11) than discretionary users 14 years after randomization.22 In a US casecontrol study, high cumulative lifetime sun exposure was associated with an increased risk of cutaneous melanoma in subjects with medium or dark skin, but not in those with fair skin.23
SAFETY — Organic – All organic sunscreens, especially oxybenzone, can cause contact allergic and photoallergic reactions, but severe reactions are uncommon.24 Estrogenic and anti-androgenic activity and neurotoxicity have been reported in vitro and in some animal studies.25 These agents penetrate the epidermis and are absorbed systemically; detectable levels have been reported in human plasma, urine, breast milk, amniotic fluid, and fetal and cord blood.26
Two randomized, open-label trials were conducted by the FDA to determine whether the active ingredients in some commercially available sunscreen products are absorbed systemically.27,28 In the first trial, a sunscreen product was applied under maximal use conditions (2 mg/cm2 every 2 hours [4 times per day] to 75% of body surface area) for 4 days; the 4 active ingredients studied (3% avobenzone, 4-6% oxybenzone, 2.35-10% octocrylene, 2% ecamsule) reached mean maximum plasma concentrations that exceeded the FDA threshold for safety testing (>0.5 ng/mL) and they remained in plasma for at least 3 days after the last application.
In the second trial, the sunscreen product was applied once on day 1, followed by maximal application on days 2-4. Mean maximum plasma concentrations after a single application were >0.5 ng/mL with all 6 of the active ingredients studied (3% avobenzone, 4-6% oxybenzone, 6-10% octocrylene, 10-15% homosalate, 5% octisalate, 7.5% octinoxate); the highest levels occurred with oxybenzone (85-94 ng/mL). All of the active ingredients had long terminal half-lives (mean range 27.3-157.4 hours); concentrations of homosalate and oxybenzone were >0.5 ng/mL in >50% of participants at 21 days.
Whether such exposure could affect hormone levels or result in other adverse effects in humans is unclear.26,29 The FDA has stated that additional studies are needed to determine the clinical significance of these findings. A study in 441 healthy women found an association between oxybenzone exposure and urinary markers of kidney dysfunction.30
Inorganic – Studies have found that titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles either do not penetrate or minimally penetrate the stratum corneum and underlying layers of skin, suggesting that systemic absorption and toxicity are unlikely.31,32 The FDA has stated that available evidence supports a GRASE classification for zinc oxide and titanium dioxide.3
Benzene – In 2021, an independent laboratory (Valisure) tested 293 samples of commercially available sunscreens and after-sun products and found that 14 (4.8%), mainly sprays, contained benzene, a known carcinogen, at concentrations above 2 parts per million (the maximum allowed by the FDA).33 According to the FDA, the contamination may be related to inactive ingredients such as isobutane (a spray propellant); some aerosol sunscreen products with high benzene concentrations have been recalled, and certain manufacturers are now required to test their products for benzene contamination.34 A retrospective analysis of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey suggested that the risk of systemic benzene exposure from sunscreen use may be low in US adults.35
Environmental Safety – Hawaii, Key West (Florida), the US Virgin Islands, and some other tourist destinations (e.g., Aruba, Palau, Bonaire) have passed ordinances and/or legislation banning the sale of sunscreens that contain oxybenzone and/or octinoxate because they can cause coral reef bleaching.36 The US Virgin Islands has also banned octocrylene. The FDA intends to evaluate the potential environmental effects associated with use of oxybenzone and octinoxate in sunscreen products.37 Detectable concentrations of sunscreen active ingredients have been observed in some fish species and adverse reproductive effects have been reported.38 Nanoparticles of zinc oxide and titanium dioxide may also have detrimental effects on the environment, including coral bleaching.39
INFANTS AND CHILDREN — Sunscreen use should generally be avoided in infants <6 months old. A broad-spectrum sunscreen with an SPF ≥30 is recommended for children >6 months old during any sun exposure that might burn unprotected skin. Inorganic sunscreens are less likely than organic sunscreens to cause irritation and sensitization.7,40
PREGNANCY — Data on sunscreen use in pregnancy are limited. The results of human and animal studies suggest that the endocrine-disrupting effects of oxybenzone may result in reproductive toxicity, including adverse effects on fetal growth41,42; an association between maternal oxybenzone exposure and Hirschsprung’s disease in their offspring has been observed.43 Inorganic sunscreens are generally preferred for pregnant women.
VITAMIN D AND SUNSCREENS — The UVB dose is the most important factor in vitamin D synthesis. The amount of UVB required for production of vitamin D is very small and is much lower than the amount that produces sunburn.25 Most people require only 2-8 minutes of unprotected exposure to summer sun to maximize synthesis of vitamin D3.
Whether sunscreen use could lead to vitamin D3 deficiency is unclear. Two reviews have evaluated the association between sunscreen use and vitamin D3 levels. Although sunscreen use decreased vitamin D3 production in some experimental studies, most randomized, controlled field trials found no change in vitamin D3 levels with daily application of a sunscreen with an SPF of ~16.44,45 A controlled study in subjects on a 1-week sun holiday found that optimal SPF 15 sunscreen use prevented erythema and increased vitamin D production; synthesis of vitamin D was greater with use of a sunscreen product with a high UVA protection factor compared to one with a low UVA protection factor because it allowed more UVB transmission.46 No trials have evaluated the effects of high-SPF sunscreens (SPF ≥50) on vitamin D3 synthesis.
APPLICATION — For maximum efficacy, sunscreen should be applied 15 minutes before sun exposure and reapplied at least every 2 hours and after swimming or sweating. Water-resistant sunscreens remain effective for 40 or 80 minutes while swimming or sweating; no sunscreens are waterproof. Sunscreen should be applied to all sun-exposed areas, using 2 to 3 tablespoons of sunscreen for the entire body and 1 to 2 teaspoons for the face and neck.16 An appropriate dose of spray sunscreen can be difficult to determine; spraying the sunscreen until the skin glistens and then rubbing it in has been recommended.7
With Insect Repellent – When using both a sunscreen and an insect repellent, the sunscreen should be applied first. Applying the insect repellent N,N-diethyl-m-tolumide (DEET) after sunscreen has been shown to reduce the SPF of the sunscreen, but applying DEET before sunscreen may increase absorption of DEET. Use of products containing both a sunscreen and an insect repellent is not recommended because the sunscreen may need to be reapplied more often and in greater amounts than the repellent.
OTHER SUN PROTECTION MEASURES — In addition to sunscreen use, The American Academy of Dermatology recommends seeking shade during hours of peak sunlight (10am-2pm) and wearing sun-protective clothing, including long-sleeve shirts, pants, wide-brimmed hats, and sunglasses with UV protection. Factors that affect the level of UV protection from clothing include fabric color, fabric type, and tightness of the weave. The ultraviolet protection factor (UPF) is a measure of how effective a fabric is at blocking UV radiation; UV protection is considered very good with a UPF rating of 30-49 and excellent with a rating of 50+.47 Washing clothes once with RIT Sun Guard, a commercially available laundry product containing a broad-spectrum UV absorber (Tinosorb FD), can confer a UPF of 30 that lasts through 20 additional washings.
- U Panich et al. Ultraviolet radiation-induced skin aging: the role of DNA damage and oxidative stress in epidermal stem cell damage mediated skin aging. Stem Cells Int 2016; 2016:7370642. doi:10.1155/2016/7370642
- M Arnold et al. Global burden of cutaneous melanoma attributable to ultraviolet radiation in 2012. Int J Cancer 2018; 143:1305. doi:10.1002/ijc.31527
- FDA. Proposed Order (OTC000008): Amending over-the-counter (OTC) monograph M020: sunscreen drug products for OTC human use. September 24, 2021. Available at: https://bit.ly/3SVWg3n.gov. Accessed June 2, 2025.
- RE Neale et al. Environmental effects of stratospheric ozone depletion, UV radiation, and interactions with climate change: UNEP Environmental Effects Assessment Panel, update 2020. Photochem Photobiol Sci 2021; 20:1. doi:10.1007/s43630-020-00001-x
- F Wang et al. Dermal damage promoted by repeated low-level UVA-1 exposure despite tanning response in human skin. JAMA Dermatol 2014; 150:401. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.8417
- US Preventive Services Task Force. Behavioral counseling to prevent skin cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA 2018; 319:1134. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.1623
- American Academy of Dermatology. Shade, clothing, and sunscreen. Available at: https://bit.ly/4kqHQ7q. Accessed June 2, 2025.
- S Moradi Tuchayi et al. Sunscreens: misconceptions and misinformation. J Invest Dermatol 2023; 143:1406. doi:10.1016/j.jid.2023.03.1677
- H Ou-Yang et al. High-SPF sunscreens (SPF ≥70) may provide ultraviolet protection above minimal recommended levels by adequately compensating for lower sunscreen user application amounts. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 67:1220. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2012.02.029
- LL Guan et al. Sunscreens and photoaging: a review of current literature. Am J Clin Dermatol 2021; 22:819. doi:10.1007/s40257-021-00632-5
- A new sunscreen agent. Med Lett Drugs Ther 2007; 49:41.
- CD D’Ruiz et al. Preliminary clinical pharmacokinetic evaluation of bemotrizinol – a new sunscreen active ingredient being considered for inclusion under FDA’s over-the-counter (OTC) sunscreen monograph. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2023; 139:105344. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105344
- SL Schneider and HW Lim. A review of inorganic UV filters zinc oxide and titanium dioxide. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2019; 35:442. doi:10.1111/phpp.12439
- JB Mancuso et al. Sunscreens: an update. Am J Clin Dermatol 2017; 18:643. doi:10.1007/s40257-017-0290-0
- AB Lyons et al. Photoprotection beyond ultraviolet radiation: a review of tinted sunscreens. J Am Acad Dermatol 2021; 84:1393. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.04.079
- S Abdel Azim et al. Sunscreens part 1: mechanisms and efficacy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2025; 92:677. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2024.02.065
- A Jesus et al. Antioxidants in sunscreens; which and what for? Antioxidants (Basel) 2023; 12:138. doi:10.3390/antiox12010138
- L Rabinovich and V Kazlouskaya. Herbal sun protection agents: human studies. Clin Dermatol 2018; 36:369. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2018.03.014
- M Sander et al. The efficacy and safety of sunscreen use for the prevention of skin cancer. CMAJ 2020; 192:E1802. doi:10.1503/cmaj.201085
- AR Young et al. Sub-optimal application of a high SPF sunscreen prevents epidermal DNA damage in vivo. Acta Derm Venereol 2018; 98:880. doi:10.2340/00015555-2992
- CG Watts et al. Sunscreen use and melanoma risk among young Australian adults. JAMA Dermatol 2018; 154:1001. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.1774
- AC Green et al. Reduced melanoma after regular sunscreen use: randomized trial follow-up. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29:257. doi:10.1200/jco.2010.28.7078
- LK Dennis. Cumulative sun exposure and melanoma in a population-based case-control study: does sun sensitivity matter? Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:1008. doi:10.3390/cancers14041008
- KA McDonald et al. Review on photoprotection: a clinician’s guide to the ingredients, characteristics, adverse effects, and disease-specific benefits of chemical and physical sunscreen compounds. Arch Dermatol Res 2023; 315:735. doi:10.1007/s00403-022-02483-4
- T Breakell et al. Ultraviolet filters: dissecting current facts and myths. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2986. doi:10.3390/jcm13102986
- S Suh et al. The banned sunscreen ingredients and their impact on human health: a systematic review. Int J Dermatol 2020; 59:1033. doi:10.1111/ijd.14824
- MK Matta et al. Effect of sunscreen application under maximal use conditions on plasma concentration of sunscreen active ingredients: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2019; 321:2082. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.5586
- MK Matta et al. Effect of sunscreen application on plasma concentration of sunscreen active ingredients: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2020; 323:256. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.20747
- JA Ruszkiewicz et al. Neurotoxic effect of active ingredients in sunscreen products, a contemporary review. Toxicol Rep 2017; 4:245. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2017.05.006
- H Kang et al. Urinary metabolites of dibutyl phthalate and benzophenone-3 are potential chemical risk factors of chronic kidney function markers among healthy women. Environ Int 2019; 124:354. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.01.028
- Australian Government Department of Health. Therapeutic Goods Administration. Literature review on the safety of titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles in sunscreens. Scientific review report. Version 1.1, August 2016. Available at: https://bit.ly/4dBLx7P. Accessed June 2, 2025.
- YH Mohammed et al. Support for the safe use of zinc oxide nanoparticle sunscreens: lack of skin penetration or cellular toxicity after repeated application in volunteers. J Invest Dermatol 2019; 139:308. doi:10.1016/j.jid.2018.08.024
- A Hudspeth et al. Independent sun care product screening for benzene contamination. Environ Health Perspect 2022; 130:37701. doi:10.1289/ehp10386
- FDA. FDA alerts drug manufacturers to the risk of benzene contamination in certain drugs. February 24, 2025. Available at: https://bit.ly/4jHf55D. Accessed June 2, 2025.
- MS Chang et al. Sunscreen use is not associated with increased blood concentrations of benzene among adults in the United States: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2006 and 2009-2018. J Am Acad Dermatol 2022; 87:440. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2021.09.003
- CA Downs et al. Toxicopathological effects of the sunscreen UV filter, oxybenzone (benzophenone-3), on coral planulae and cultured primary cells and its environmental contamination in Hawaii and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 2016; 70:265. doi:10.1007/s00244-015-0227-7
- FDA. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for certain sunscreen drug products. October 13, 2021. Available at: https://bit.ly/3weZrFT. Accessed June 2, 2025.
- SL Schneider and HW Lim. Review of environmental effects of oxybenzone and other sunscreen active ingredients. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019; 80:266. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2018.06.033
- D Fivenson et al. Sunscreens: UV filters to protect us: part 2-increasing awareness of UV filters and their potential toxicities to us and our environment. Int J Women’s Dermatol 2021; 7:45. doi:10.1016/j.ijwd.2020.08.008
- FDA. Sunscreen: how to help protect your skin from the sun. August 16, 2024. Available at: https://bit.ly/4mAxbc1. Accessed June 2, 2025.
- M Ghazipura et al. Exposure to benzophenone-3 and reproductive toxicity: a systematic review of human and animal studies. Reprod Toxicol 2017; 73:175. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2017.08.015
- H Teiri et al. The association of prenatal exposure to benzophenones with gestational age and offspring size at birth. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2022; 29:24682. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-17634-9
- JC DiNardo and CA Downs. Can oxybenzone cause Hirschsprung’s disease? Reprod Toxicol 2019; 86:98. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox. 2019.02.014
- RE Neale et al. The effect of sunscreen on vitamin D: a review. Br J Dermatol 2019; 181:907. doi:10.1111/bjd.17980
- T Passeron et al. Sunscreen photoprotection and vitamin D status. Br J Dermatol 2019; 181:916. doi:10.1111/bjd.17992
- AR Young et al. Optimal sunscreen use, during a sun holiday with a very high ultraviolet index, allows vitamin D synthesis without sunburn. Br J Dermatol 2019; 181:1052. doi:10.1111/bjd.17888
- Skin Cancer Foundation. Sun-protective clothing. April 2025. Available at: https://bit.ly/43ASyBa. Accessed June 2, 2025.


Mateo Rosiles









